Information on Result #547707

There is no linear OA(2209, 359, F2, 90) (dual of [359, 150, 91]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. OA(2208, 299, S2, 90), but
    • adding a parity check bit [i] would yield OA(2209, 300, S2, 91), but
      • the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 437987 836379 661851 428112 482969 460104 960459 291237 979833 080590 515802 667419 590325 215760 903409 709975 863296 / 433 753365 263741 276278 643266 060465 678125 > 2209 [i]
  2. linear OA(2150, 359, F2, 60) (dual of [359, 209, 61]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2210, 360, F2, 91) (dual of [360, 150, 92]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2210, 359, F2, 2, 91) (dual of [(359, 2), 508, 92]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2209, 359, F2, 2, 90) (dual of [(359, 2), 509, 91]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2209, 359, F2, 3, 90) (dual of [(359, 3), 868, 91]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2209, 359, F2, 4, 90) (dual of [(359, 4), 1227, 91]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2209, 359, F2, 5, 90) (dual of [(359, 5), 1586, 91]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2209, 359, F2, 6, 90) (dual of [(359, 6), 1945, 91]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2209, 359, F2, 7, 90) (dual of [(359, 7), 2304, 91]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2209, 359, F2, 8, 90) (dual of [(359, 8), 2663, 91]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (119, 209, 359)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array