Information on Result #548029

There is no linear OA(9127, 261, F9, 110) (dual of [261, 134, 111]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. OA(9126, 144, S9, 110), but
    • the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 13985 352127 709815 135823 207322 213660 655679 036196 057151 464807 486617 148753 068973 647813 060841 422573 871412 475846 092090 726797 721652 094761 117031 / 7512 322263 802055 > 9126 [i]
  2. linear OA(9134, 261, F9, 117) (dual of [261, 127, 118]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(9128, 262, F9, 111) (dual of [262, 134, 112]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(9129, 263, F9, 112) (dual of [263, 134, 113]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(9130, 264, F9, 113) (dual of [264, 134, 114]-code) [i]
4No linear OA(9131, 265, F9, 114) (dual of [265, 134, 115]-code) [i]
5No linear OA(9132, 266, F9, 115) (dual of [266, 134, 116]-code) [i]
6No linear OA(9133, 267, F9, 116) (dual of [267, 134, 117]-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(9128, 261, F9, 2, 111) (dual of [(261, 2), 394, 112]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
8No linear OOA(9129, 261, F9, 2, 112) (dual of [(261, 2), 393, 113]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(9130, 261, F9, 2, 113) (dual of [(261, 2), 392, 114]-NRT-code) [i]
10No linear OOA(9131, 261, F9, 2, 114) (dual of [(261, 2), 391, 115]-NRT-code) [i]
11No linear OOA(9132, 261, F9, 2, 115) (dual of [(261, 2), 390, 116]-NRT-code) [i]
12No linear OOA(9133, 261, F9, 2, 116) (dual of [(261, 2), 389, 117]-NRT-code) [i]
13No linear OOA(9127, 261, F9, 2, 110) (dual of [(261, 2), 395, 111]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
14No linear OOA(9127, 261, F9, 3, 110) (dual of [(261, 3), 656, 111]-NRT-code) [i]
15No digital (17, 127, 261)-net over F9 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array