Information on Result #548309

There is no linear OA(2106, 115, F2, 54) (dual of [115, 9, 55]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(252, 60, F2, 27) (dual of [60, 8, 28]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2107, 116, F2, 55) (dual of [116, 9, 56]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2106, 115, F2, 2, 54) (dual of [(115, 2), 124, 55]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
3No linear OOA(2106, 115, F2, 3, 54) (dual of [(115, 3), 239, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2106, 115, F2, 4, 54) (dual of [(115, 4), 354, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2106, 115, F2, 5, 54) (dual of [(115, 5), 469, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2106, 115, F2, 6, 54) (dual of [(115, 6), 584, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2106, 115, F2, 7, 54) (dual of [(115, 7), 699, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2106, 115, F2, 8, 54) (dual of [(115, 8), 814, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OA(2214, 224, F2, 108) (dual of [224, 10, 109]-code) [i]Residual Code