Information on Result #548340

There is no linear OA(2152, 164, F2, 76) (dual of [164, 12, 77]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(276, 87, F2, 38) (dual of [87, 11, 39]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2153, 165, F2, 77) (dual of [165, 12, 78]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2153, 164, F2, 2, 77) (dual of [(164, 2), 175, 78]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2154, 164, F2, 2, 78) (dual of [(164, 2), 174, 79]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2155, 164, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(164, 2), 173, 80]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2152, 164, F2, 2, 76) (dual of [(164, 2), 176, 77]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(2152, 164, F2, 3, 76) (dual of [(164, 3), 340, 77]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2152, 164, F2, 4, 76) (dual of [(164, 4), 504, 77]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2152, 164, F2, 5, 76) (dual of [(164, 5), 668, 77]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2152, 164, F2, 6, 76) (dual of [(164, 6), 832, 77]-NRT-code) [i]
10No linear OOA(2152, 164, F2, 7, 76) (dual of [(164, 7), 996, 77]-NRT-code) [i]
11No linear OOA(2152, 164, F2, 8, 76) (dual of [(164, 8), 1160, 77]-NRT-code) [i]
12No digital (76, 152, 164)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array