Information on Result #548461

There is no linear OA(3165, 171, F3, 111) (dual of [171, 6, 112]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(354, 59, F3, 37) (dual of [59, 5, 38]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3166, 172, F3, 112) (dual of [172, 6, 113]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3167, 173, F3, 113) (dual of [173, 6, 114]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3165, 171, F3, 2, 111) (dual of [(171, 2), 177, 112]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(3165, 171, F3, 3, 111) (dual of [(171, 3), 348, 112]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3165, 171, F3, 4, 111) (dual of [(171, 4), 519, 112]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(3165, 171, F3, 5, 111) (dual of [(171, 5), 690, 112]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OA(3166, 175, F3, 111) (dual of [175, 9, 112]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)