Information on Result #548501

There is no linear OA(4186, 195, F4, 140) (dual of [195, 9, 141]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(446, 54, F4, 35) (dual of [54, 8, 36]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4187, 196, F4, 141) (dual of [196, 9, 142]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(4187, 195, F4, 2, 141) (dual of [(195, 2), 203, 142]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(4188, 195, F4, 2, 142) (dual of [(195, 2), 202, 143]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4189, 195, F4, 2, 143) (dual of [(195, 2), 201, 144]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(4186, 195, F4, 2, 140) (dual of [(195, 2), 204, 141]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(4186, 195, F4, 3, 140) (dual of [(195, 3), 399, 141]-NRT-code) [i]
7No digital (46, 186, 195)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array