Information on Result #548537

There is no linear OA(266, 82, F2, 32) (dual of [82, 16, 33]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(265, 76, F2, 32) (dual of [76, 11, 33]-code), but
  2. OA(216, 82, S2, 6), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(267, 83, F2, 33) (dual of [83, 16, 34]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(267, 82, F2, 2, 33) (dual of [(82, 2), 97, 34]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(266, 82, F2, 2, 32) (dual of [(82, 2), 98, 33]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(266, 82, F2, 3, 32) (dual of [(82, 3), 180, 33]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(266, 82, F2, 4, 32) (dual of [(82, 4), 262, 33]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(266, 82, F2, 5, 32) (dual of [(82, 5), 344, 33]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(266, 82, F2, 6, 32) (dual of [(82, 6), 426, 33]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(266, 82, F2, 7, 32) (dual of [(82, 7), 508, 33]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(266, 82, F2, 8, 32) (dual of [(82, 8), 590, 33]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (34, 66, 82)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array