Information on Result #550573
There is no linear OOA(211, 34, F2, 2, 5) (dual of [(34, 2), 57, 6]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(210, 34, F2, 4) (dual of [34, 24, 5]-code), but
- “BoV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(211, 34, F2, 3, 5) (dual of [(34, 3), 91, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(211, 34, F2, 4, 5) (dual of [(34, 4), 125, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(211, 34, F2, 5, 5) (dual of [(34, 5), 159, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(211, 34, F2, 6, 5) (dual of [(34, 6), 193, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(211, 34, F2, 7, 5) (dual of [(34, 7), 227, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(211, 34, F2, 8, 5) (dual of [(34, 8), 261, 6]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||