Information on Result #550625
There is no linear OOA(236, 43, F2, 2, 19) (dual of [(43, 2), 50, 20]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(235, 43, F2, 18) (dual of [43, 8, 19]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(236, 44, F2, 19) (dual of [44, 8, 20]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(236, 43, F2, 3, 19) (dual of [(43, 3), 93, 20]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(236, 43, F2, 4, 19) (dual of [(43, 4), 136, 20]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(236, 43, F2, 5, 19) (dual of [(43, 5), 179, 20]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(236, 43, F2, 6, 19) (dual of [(43, 6), 222, 20]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(236, 43, F2, 7, 19) (dual of [(43, 7), 265, 20]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(236, 43, F2, 8, 19) (dual of [(43, 8), 308, 20]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||