Information on Result #550640
There is no linear OOA(239, 42, F2, 2, 22) (dual of [(42, 2), 45, 23]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(237, 42, F2, 20) (dual of [42, 5, 21]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(239, 42, F2, 3, 22) (dual of [(42, 3), 87, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(239, 42, F2, 4, 22) (dual of [(42, 4), 129, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(239, 42, F2, 5, 22) (dual of [(42, 5), 171, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(239, 42, F2, 6, 22) (dual of [(42, 6), 213, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(239, 42, F2, 7, 22) (dual of [(42, 7), 255, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(239, 42, F2, 8, 22) (dual of [(42, 8), 297, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||