Information on Result #550656
There is no linear OOA(242, 48, F2, 2, 23) (dual of [(48, 2), 54, 24]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(239, 48, F2, 20) (dual of [48, 9, 21]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(240, 49, F2, 20) (dual of [49, 9, 21]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(242, 48, F2, 3, 23) (dual of [(48, 3), 102, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(242, 48, F2, 4, 23) (dual of [(48, 4), 150, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(242, 48, F2, 5, 23) (dual of [(48, 5), 198, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(242, 48, F2, 6, 23) (dual of [(48, 6), 246, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(242, 48, F2, 7, 23) (dual of [(48, 7), 294, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(242, 48, F2, 8, 23) (dual of [(48, 8), 342, 24]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||