Information on Result #550666
There is no linear OOA(244, 74, F2, 2, 21) (dual of [(74, 2), 104, 22]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(243, 74, F2, 20) (dual of [74, 31, 21]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(244, 74, F2, 3, 21) (dual of [(74, 3), 178, 22]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(244, 74, F2, 4, 21) (dual of [(74, 4), 252, 22]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(244, 74, F2, 5, 21) (dual of [(74, 5), 326, 22]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(244, 74, F2, 6, 21) (dual of [(74, 6), 400, 22]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(244, 74, F2, 7, 21) (dual of [(74, 7), 474, 22]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(244, 74, F2, 8, 21) (dual of [(74, 8), 548, 22]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||