Information on Result #550697
There is no linear OOA(249, 50, F2, 2, 28) (dual of [(50, 2), 51, 29]-NRT-code), because 4 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(245, 50, F2, 24) (dual of [50, 5, 25]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(249, 50, F2, 3, 28) (dual of [(50, 3), 101, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(249, 50, F2, 4, 28) (dual of [(50, 4), 151, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(249, 50, F2, 5, 28) (dual of [(50, 5), 201, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(249, 50, F2, 6, 28) (dual of [(50, 6), 251, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(249, 50, F2, 7, 28) (dual of [(50, 7), 301, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(249, 50, F2, 8, 28) (dual of [(50, 8), 351, 29]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||