Information on Result #550741
There is no linear OOA(256, 80, F2, 2, 27) (dual of [(80, 2), 104, 28]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(255, 80, F2, 26) (dual of [80, 25, 27]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(256, 80, F2, 3, 27) (dual of [(80, 3), 184, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(256, 80, F2, 4, 27) (dual of [(80, 4), 264, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(256, 80, F2, 5, 27) (dual of [(80, 5), 344, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(256, 80, F2, 6, 27) (dual of [(80, 6), 424, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(256, 80, F2, 7, 27) (dual of [(80, 7), 504, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(256, 80, F2, 8, 27) (dual of [(80, 8), 584, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||