Information on Result #550765
There is no linear OOA(259, 106, F2, 2, 27) (dual of [(106, 2), 153, 28]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(258, 106, F2, 26) (dual of [106, 48, 27]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(259, 107, F2, 27) (dual of [107, 48, 28]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(259, 106, F2, 3, 27) (dual of [(106, 3), 259, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(259, 106, F2, 4, 27) (dual of [(106, 4), 365, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(259, 106, F2, 5, 27) (dual of [(106, 5), 471, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(259, 106, F2, 6, 27) (dual of [(106, 6), 577, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(259, 106, F2, 7, 27) (dual of [(106, 7), 683, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(259, 106, F2, 8, 27) (dual of [(106, 8), 789, 28]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||