Information on Result #550766

There is no linear OOA(259, 76, F2, 2, 29) (dual of [(76, 2), 93, 30]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(258, 76, F2, 28) (dual of [76, 18, 29]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(259, 76, F2, 3, 29) (dual of [(76, 3), 169, 30]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(259, 76, F2, 4, 29) (dual of [(76, 4), 245, 30]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(259, 76, F2, 5, 29) (dual of [(76, 5), 321, 30]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(259, 76, F2, 6, 29) (dual of [(76, 6), 397, 30]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(259, 76, F2, 7, 29) (dual of [(76, 7), 473, 30]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(259, 76, F2, 8, 29) (dual of [(76, 8), 549, 30]-NRT-code) [i]