Information on Result #550780
There is no linear OOA(261, 91, F2, 2, 29) (dual of [(91, 2), 121, 30]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(260, 91, F2, 28) (dual of [91, 31, 29]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(261, 92, F2, 29) (dual of [92, 31, 30]-code), but
- “Bro†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(261, 91, F2, 3, 29) (dual of [(91, 3), 212, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(261, 91, F2, 4, 29) (dual of [(91, 4), 303, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(261, 91, F2, 5, 29) (dual of [(91, 5), 394, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(261, 91, F2, 6, 29) (dual of [(91, 6), 485, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(261, 91, F2, 7, 29) (dual of [(91, 7), 576, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(261, 91, F2, 8, 29) (dual of [(91, 8), 667, 30]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||