Information on Result #550819
There is no linear OOA(265, 68, F2, 2, 35) (dual of [(68, 2), 71, 36]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(262, 68, F2, 32) (dual of [68, 6, 33]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(265, 68, F2, 3, 35) (dual of [(68, 3), 139, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(265, 68, F2, 4, 35) (dual of [(68, 4), 207, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(265, 68, F2, 5, 35) (dual of [(68, 5), 275, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(265, 68, F2, 6, 35) (dual of [(68, 6), 343, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(265, 68, F2, 7, 35) (dual of [(68, 7), 411, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(265, 68, F2, 8, 35) (dual of [(68, 8), 479, 36]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||