Information on Result #550937
There is no linear OOA(276, 85, F2, 2, 39) (dual of [(85, 2), 94, 40]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(275, 85, F2, 38) (dual of [85, 10, 39]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(276, 85, F2, 3, 39) (dual of [(85, 3), 179, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(276, 85, F2, 4, 39) (dual of [(85, 4), 264, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(276, 85, F2, 5, 39) (dual of [(85, 5), 349, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(276, 85, F2, 6, 39) (dual of [(85, 6), 434, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(276, 85, F2, 7, 39) (dual of [(85, 7), 519, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(276, 85, F2, 8, 39) (dual of [(85, 8), 604, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||