Information on Result #551095
There is no linear OOA(288, 83, F2, 2, 51) (dual of [(83, 2), 78, 52]-NRT-code), because 11 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(277, 83, F2, 40) (dual of [83, 6, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(288, 83, F2, 3, 51) (dual of [(83, 3), 161, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(288, 83, F2, 4, 51) (dual of [(83, 4), 244, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||