Information on Result #551232
There is no linear OOA(298, 96, F2, 2, 55) (dual of [(96, 2), 94, 56]-NRT-code), because 11 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(287, 96, F2, 44) (dual of [96, 9, 45]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(298, 96, F2, 3, 55) (dual of [(96, 3), 190, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(298, 96, F2, 4, 55) (dual of [(96, 4), 286, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(298, 96, F2, 5, 55) (dual of [(96, 5), 382, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(298, 96, F2, 6, 55) (dual of [(96, 6), 478, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(298, 96, F2, 7, 55) (dual of [(96, 7), 574, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(298, 96, F2, 8, 55) (dual of [(96, 8), 670, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||