Information on Result #551271
There is no linear OOA(2101, 111, F2, 2, 51) (dual of [(111, 2), 121, 52]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2100, 111, F2, 50) (dual of [111, 11, 51]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2101, 111, F2, 3, 51) (dual of [(111, 3), 232, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2101, 111, F2, 4, 51) (dual of [(111, 4), 343, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2101, 111, F2, 5, 51) (dual of [(111, 5), 454, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2101, 111, F2, 6, 51) (dual of [(111, 6), 565, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2101, 111, F2, 7, 51) (dual of [(111, 7), 676, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2101, 111, F2, 8, 51) (dual of [(111, 8), 787, 52]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||