Information on Result #551534

There is no linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 2, 55) (dual of [(168, 2), 218, 56]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2117, 168, F2, 54) (dual of [168, 51, 55]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 3, 55) (dual of [(168, 3), 386, 56]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 4, 55) (dual of [(168, 4), 554, 56]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 5, 55) (dual of [(168, 5), 722, 56]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 6, 55) (dual of [(168, 6), 890, 56]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 7, 55) (dual of [(168, 7), 1058, 56]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 8, 55) (dual of [(168, 8), 1226, 56]-NRT-code) [i]