Information on Result #551534
There is no linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 2, 55) (dual of [(168, 2), 218, 56]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2117, 168, F2, 54) (dual of [168, 51, 55]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(2116, 148, S2, 54), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 67 089316 460630 621624 223128 238837 181334 945792 / 674 571975 > 2116 [i]
- OA(251, 168, S2, 20), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(251, 159, S2, 20), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 2282 987168 569557 > 251 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(251, 159, S2, 20), but
- OA(2116, 148, S2, 54), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 3, 55) (dual of [(168, 3), 386, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 4, 55) (dual of [(168, 4), 554, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 5, 55) (dual of [(168, 5), 722, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 6, 55) (dual of [(168, 6), 890, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 7, 55) (dual of [(168, 7), 1058, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 8, 55) (dual of [(168, 8), 1226, 56]-NRT-code) | [i] |