Information on Result #551643

There is no linear OOA(2125, 166, F2, 2, 59) (dual of [(166, 2), 207, 60]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2124, 166, F2, 58) (dual of [166, 42, 59]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2125, 166, F2, 3, 59) (dual of [(166, 3), 373, 60]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2125, 166, F2, 4, 59) (dual of [(166, 4), 539, 60]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2125, 166, F2, 5, 59) (dual of [(166, 5), 705, 60]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2125, 166, F2, 6, 59) (dual of [(166, 6), 871, 60]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2125, 166, F2, 7, 59) (dual of [(166, 7), 1037, 60]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2125, 166, F2, 8, 59) (dual of [(166, 8), 1203, 60]-NRT-code) [i]