Information on Result #551694

There is no linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 2, 61) (dual of [(161, 2), 194, 62]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2127, 161, F2, 60) (dual of [161, 34, 61]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 3, 61) (dual of [(161, 3), 355, 62]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 4, 61) (dual of [(161, 4), 516, 62]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 5, 61) (dual of [(161, 5), 677, 62]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 6, 61) (dual of [(161, 6), 838, 62]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 7, 61) (dual of [(161, 7), 999, 62]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 8, 61) (dual of [(161, 8), 1160, 62]-NRT-code) [i]