Information on Result #551694
There is no linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 2, 61) (dual of [(161, 2), 194, 62]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2127, 161, F2, 60) (dual of [161, 34, 61]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(2126, 149, S2, 60), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 40 354766 457887 934259 048521 444548 255732 989952 / 438495 > 2126 [i]
- OA(234, 161, S2, 12), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(234, 154, S2, 12), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 17486 314616 > 234 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(234, 154, S2, 12), but
- OA(2126, 149, S2, 60), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 3, 61) (dual of [(161, 3), 355, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 4, 61) (dual of [(161, 4), 516, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 5, 61) (dual of [(161, 5), 677, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 6, 61) (dual of [(161, 6), 838, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 7, 61) (dual of [(161, 7), 999, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2128, 161, F2, 8, 61) (dual of [(161, 8), 1160, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] |