Information on Result #552055
There is no linear OOA(2146, 173, F2, 2, 71) (dual of [(173, 2), 200, 72]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2145, 173, F2, 70) (dual of [173, 28, 71]-code), but
- 3 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2148, 176, F2, 70) (dual of [176, 28, 71]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2149, 177, F2, 71) (dual of [177, 28, 72]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2146, 173, F2, 3, 71) (dual of [(173, 3), 373, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2146, 173, F2, 4, 71) (dual of [(173, 4), 546, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2146, 173, F2, 5, 71) (dual of [(173, 5), 719, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2146, 173, F2, 6, 71) (dual of [(173, 6), 892, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2146, 173, F2, 7, 71) (dual of [(173, 7), 1065, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2146, 173, F2, 8, 71) (dual of [(173, 8), 1238, 72]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||