Information on Result #552056
There is no linear OOA(2146, 159, F2, 2, 73) (dual of [(159, 2), 172, 74]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2145, 159, F2, 72) (dual of [159, 14, 73]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(273, 86, F2, 36) (dual of [86, 13, 37]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2146, 159, F2, 3, 73) (dual of [(159, 3), 331, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2146, 159, F2, 4, 73) (dual of [(159, 4), 490, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2146, 159, F2, 5, 73) (dual of [(159, 5), 649, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2146, 159, F2, 6, 73) (dual of [(159, 6), 808, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2146, 159, F2, 7, 73) (dual of [(159, 7), 967, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2146, 159, F2, 8, 73) (dual of [(159, 8), 1126, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||