Information on Result #552123
There is no linear OOA(2149, 162, F2, 2, 75) (dual of [(162, 2), 175, 76]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2148, 162, F2, 74) (dual of [162, 14, 75]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(274, 87, F2, 37) (dual of [87, 13, 38]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(273, 86, F2, 36) (dual of [86, 13, 37]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2149, 162, F2, 3, 75) (dual of [(162, 3), 337, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2149, 162, F2, 4, 75) (dual of [(162, 4), 499, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2149, 162, F2, 5, 75) (dual of [(162, 5), 661, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2149, 162, F2, 6, 75) (dual of [(162, 6), 823, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2149, 162, F2, 7, 75) (dual of [(162, 7), 985, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2149, 162, F2, 8, 75) (dual of [(162, 8), 1147, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||