Information on Result #552145
There is no linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 2, 73) (dual of [(175, 2), 200, 74]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2147, 175, F2, 70) (dual of [175, 28, 71]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2148, 176, F2, 70) (dual of [176, 28, 71]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2149, 177, F2, 71) (dual of [177, 28, 72]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 3, 73) (dual of [(175, 3), 375, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 4, 73) (dual of [(175, 4), 550, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 5, 73) (dual of [(175, 5), 725, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 6, 73) (dual of [(175, 6), 900, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 7, 73) (dual of [(175, 7), 1075, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 8, 73) (dual of [(175, 8), 1250, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] |