Information on Result #552145

There is no linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 2, 73) (dual of [(175, 2), 200, 74]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2147, 175, F2, 70) (dual of [175, 28, 71]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 3, 73) (dual of [(175, 3), 375, 74]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 4, 73) (dual of [(175, 4), 550, 74]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 5, 73) (dual of [(175, 5), 725, 74]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 6, 73) (dual of [(175, 6), 900, 74]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 7, 73) (dual of [(175, 7), 1075, 74]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2150, 175, F2, 8, 73) (dual of [(175, 8), 1250, 74]-NRT-code) [i]