Information on Result #552241
There is no linear OOA(2154, 162, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(162, 2), 170, 80]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2151, 162, F2, 76) (dual of [162, 11, 77]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(275, 85, F2, 38) (dual of [85, 10, 39]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2154, 162, F2, 3, 79) (dual of [(162, 3), 332, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2154, 162, F2, 4, 79) (dual of [(162, 4), 494, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2154, 162, F2, 5, 79) (dual of [(162, 5), 656, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2154, 162, F2, 6, 79) (dual of [(162, 6), 818, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2154, 162, F2, 7, 79) (dual of [(162, 7), 980, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2154, 162, F2, 8, 79) (dual of [(162, 8), 1142, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||