Information on Result #552289
There is no linear OOA(2156, 167, F2, 2, 79) (dual of [(167, 2), 178, 80]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2155, 167, F2, 78) (dual of [167, 12, 79]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(277, 88, F2, 39) (dual of [88, 11, 40]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(276, 87, F2, 38) (dual of [87, 11, 39]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2156, 167, F2, 3, 79) (dual of [(167, 3), 345, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2156, 167, F2, 4, 79) (dual of [(167, 4), 512, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2156, 167, F2, 5, 79) (dual of [(167, 5), 679, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2156, 167, F2, 6, 79) (dual of [(167, 6), 846, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2156, 167, F2, 7, 79) (dual of [(167, 7), 1013, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2156, 167, F2, 8, 79) (dual of [(167, 8), 1180, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||