Information on Result #552310
There is no linear OOA(2157, 190, F2, 2, 75) (dual of [(190, 2), 223, 76]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2156, 190, F2, 74) (dual of [190, 34, 75]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(2155, 178, F2, 74) (dual of [178, 23, 75]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2156, 179, F2, 75) (dual of [179, 23, 76]-code), but
- OA(234, 190, S2, 12), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(234, 154, S2, 12), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 17486 314616 > 234 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(234, 154, S2, 12), but
- linear OA(2155, 178, F2, 74) (dual of [178, 23, 75]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(2157, 190, F2, 3, 75) (dual of [(190, 3), 413, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(2157, 190, F2, 4, 75) (dual of [(190, 4), 603, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(2157, 190, F2, 5, 75) (dual of [(190, 5), 793, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(2157, 190, F2, 6, 75) (dual of [(190, 6), 983, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(2157, 190, F2, 7, 75) (dual of [(190, 7), 1173, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2157, 190, F2, 8, 75) (dual of [(190, 8), 1363, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] |