Information on Result #552370
There is no linear OOA(2159, 161, F2, 2, 84) (dual of [(161, 2), 163, 85]-NRT-code), because 4 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2155, 161, F2, 80) (dual of [161, 6, 81]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2156, 162, F2, 80) (dual of [162, 6, 81]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2159, 161, F2, 3, 84) (dual of [(161, 3), 324, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2159, 161, F2, 4, 84) (dual of [(161, 4), 485, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2159, 161, F2, 5, 84) (dual of [(161, 5), 646, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2159, 161, F2, 6, 84) (dual of [(161, 6), 807, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2159, 161, F2, 7, 84) (dual of [(161, 7), 968, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2159, 161, F2, 8, 84) (dual of [(161, 8), 1129, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||