Information on Result #552520
There is no linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(178, 2), 191, 84]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2164, 178, F2, 82) (dual of [178, 14, 83]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(282, 95, F2, 41) (dual of [95, 13, 42]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(281, 94, F2, 40) (dual of [94, 13, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 3, 83) (dual of [(178, 3), 369, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 4, 83) (dual of [(178, 4), 547, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 5, 83) (dual of [(178, 5), 725, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 6, 83) (dual of [(178, 6), 903, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 7, 83) (dual of [(178, 7), 1081, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 8, 83) (dual of [(178, 8), 1259, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||