Information on Result #552615
There is no linear OOA(2168, 159, F2, 2, 94) (dual of [(159, 2), 150, 95]-NRT-code), because 18 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2150, 159, F2, 76) (dual of [159, 9, 77]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(274, 82, F2, 38) (dual of [82, 8, 39]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(275, 83, F2, 39) (dual of [83, 8, 40]-code), but
- “DHM†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(275, 83, F2, 39) (dual of [83, 8, 40]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2168, 159, F2, 3, 94) (dual of [(159, 3), 309, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2168, 159, F2, 4, 94) (dual of [(159, 4), 468, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||