Information on Result #552637
There is no linear OOA(2169, 171, F2, 2, 89) (dual of [(171, 2), 173, 90]-NRT-code), because 9 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2160, 171, F2, 80) (dual of [171, 11, 81]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(280, 90, F2, 40) (dual of [90, 10, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(240, 49, F2, 20) (dual of [49, 9, 21]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2169, 171, F2, 3, 89) (dual of [(171, 3), 344, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2169, 171, F2, 4, 89) (dual of [(171, 4), 515, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2169, 171, F2, 5, 89) (dual of [(171, 5), 686, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2169, 171, F2, 6, 89) (dual of [(171, 6), 857, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2169, 171, F2, 7, 89) (dual of [(171, 7), 1028, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2169, 171, F2, 8, 89) (dual of [(171, 8), 1199, 90]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||