Information on Result #552660
There is no linear OOA(2170, 184, F2, 2, 85) (dual of [(184, 2), 198, 86]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2169, 184, F2, 84) (dual of [184, 15, 85]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(285, 99, F2, 42) (dual of [99, 14, 43]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2170, 184, F2, 3, 85) (dual of [(184, 3), 382, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2170, 184, F2, 4, 85) (dual of [(184, 4), 566, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2170, 184, F2, 5, 85) (dual of [(184, 5), 750, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2170, 184, F2, 6, 85) (dual of [(184, 6), 934, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2170, 184, F2, 7, 85) (dual of [(184, 7), 1118, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2170, 184, F2, 8, 85) (dual of [(184, 8), 1302, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||