Information on Result #553050
There is no linear OOA(2183, 179, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(179, 2), 175, 100]-NRT-code), because 11 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2172, 179, F2, 88) (dual of [179, 7, 89]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2183, 179, F2, 3, 99) (dual of [(179, 3), 354, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2183, 179, F2, 4, 99) (dual of [(179, 4), 533, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2183, 179, F2, 5, 99) (dual of [(179, 5), 712, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2183, 179, F2, 6, 99) (dual of [(179, 6), 891, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2183, 179, F2, 7, 99) (dual of [(179, 7), 1070, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2183, 179, F2, 8, 99) (dual of [(179, 8), 1249, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||