Information on Result #553082

There is no linear OOA(2184, 179, F2, 2, 100) (dual of [(179, 2), 174, 101]-NRT-code), because 12 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2172, 179, F2, 88) (dual of [179, 7, 89]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2184, 179, F2, 3, 100) (dual of [(179, 3), 353, 101]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2184, 179, F2, 4, 100) (dual of [(179, 4), 532, 101]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2184, 179, F2, 5, 100) (dual of [(179, 5), 711, 101]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2184, 179, F2, 6, 100) (dual of [(179, 6), 890, 101]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2184, 179, F2, 7, 100) (dual of [(179, 7), 1069, 101]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2184, 179, F2, 8, 100) (dual of [(179, 8), 1248, 101]-NRT-code) [i]