Information on Result #553257
There is no linear OOA(2190, 193, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(193, 2), 196, 100]-NRT-code), because 3 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2187, 193, F2, 96) (dual of [193, 6, 97]-code), but
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2188, 194, F2, 96) (dual of [194, 6, 97]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2190, 193, F2, 3, 99) (dual of [(193, 3), 389, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2190, 193, F2, 4, 99) (dual of [(193, 4), 582, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2190, 193, F2, 5, 99) (dual of [(193, 5), 775, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2190, 193, F2, 6, 99) (dual of [(193, 6), 968, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2190, 193, F2, 7, 99) (dual of [(193, 7), 1161, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2190, 193, F2, 8, 99) (dual of [(193, 8), 1354, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||