Information on Result #553292
There is no linear OOA(2191, 185, F2, 2, 104) (dual of [(185, 2), 179, 105]-NRT-code), because 16 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2175, 185, F2, 88) (dual of [185, 10, 89]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(287, 96, F2, 44) (dual of [96, 9, 45]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2191, 185, F2, 3, 104) (dual of [(185, 3), 364, 105]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2191, 185, F2, 4, 104) (dual of [(185, 4), 549, 105]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2191, 185, F2, 5, 104) (dual of [(185, 5), 734, 105]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2191, 185, F2, 6, 104) (dual of [(185, 6), 919, 105]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2191, 185, F2, 7, 104) (dual of [(185, 7), 1104, 105]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2191, 185, F2, 8, 104) (dual of [(185, 8), 1289, 105]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||