Information on Result #553416
There is no linear OOA(2195, 190, F2, 2, 106) (dual of [(190, 2), 185, 107]-NRT-code), because 16 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2179, 190, F2, 90) (dual of [190, 11, 91]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(289, 99, F2, 45) (dual of [99, 10, 46]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2195, 190, F2, 3, 106) (dual of [(190, 3), 375, 107]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2195, 190, F2, 4, 106) (dual of [(190, 4), 565, 107]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2195, 190, F2, 5, 106) (dual of [(190, 5), 755, 107]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2195, 190, F2, 6, 106) (dual of [(190, 6), 945, 107]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2195, 190, F2, 7, 106) (dual of [(190, 7), 1135, 107]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2195, 190, F2, 8, 106) (dual of [(190, 8), 1325, 107]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||