Information on Result #553419
There is no linear OOA(2195, 183, F2, 2, 109) (dual of [(183, 2), 171, 110]-NRT-code), because 21 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2174, 183, F2, 88) (dual of [183, 9, 89]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(286, 94, F2, 44) (dual of [94, 8, 45]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(287, 95, F2, 45) (dual of [95, 8, 46]-code), but
- “DHM†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(287, 95, F2, 45) (dual of [95, 8, 46]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2195, 183, F2, 3, 109) (dual of [(183, 3), 354, 110]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2195, 183, F2, 4, 109) (dual of [(183, 4), 537, 110]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2195, 183, F2, 5, 109) (dual of [(183, 5), 720, 110]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2195, 183, F2, 6, 109) (dual of [(183, 6), 903, 110]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||