Information on Result #554215
There is no linear OOA(2223, 225, F2, 2, 116) (dual of [(225, 2), 227, 117]-NRT-code), because 4 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2219, 225, F2, 112) (dual of [225, 6, 113]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(2223, 225, F2, 3, 116) (dual of [(225, 3), 452, 117]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(2223, 225, F2, 4, 116) (dual of [(225, 4), 677, 117]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(2223, 225, F2, 5, 116) (dual of [(225, 5), 902, 117]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(2223, 225, F2, 6, 116) (dual of [(225, 6), 1127, 117]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(2223, 225, F2, 7, 116) (dual of [(225, 7), 1352, 117]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2223, 225, F2, 8, 116) (dual of [(225, 8), 1577, 117]-NRT-code) | [i] |