Information on Result #554513
There is no linear OOA(2235, 225, F2, 2, 128) (dual of [(225, 2), 215, 129]-NRT-code), because 16 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2219, 225, F2, 112) (dual of [225, 6, 113]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2235, 225, F2, 3, 128) (dual of [(225, 3), 440, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2235, 225, F2, 4, 128) (dual of [(225, 4), 665, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2235, 225, F2, 5, 128) (dual of [(225, 5), 890, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2235, 225, F2, 6, 128) (dual of [(225, 6), 1115, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2235, 225, F2, 7, 128) (dual of [(225, 7), 1340, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2235, 225, F2, 8, 128) (dual of [(225, 8), 1565, 129]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||