Information on Result #554587
There is no linear OOA(2238, 225, F2, 2, 131) (dual of [(225, 2), 212, 132]-NRT-code), because 19 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2219, 225, F2, 112) (dual of [225, 6, 113]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2238, 225, F2, 3, 131) (dual of [(225, 3), 437, 132]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2238, 225, F2, 4, 131) (dual of [(225, 4), 662, 132]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2238, 225, F2, 5, 131) (dual of [(225, 5), 887, 132]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2238, 225, F2, 6, 131) (dual of [(225, 6), 1112, 132]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2238, 225, F2, 7, 131) (dual of [(225, 7), 1337, 132]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2238, 225, F2, 8, 131) (dual of [(225, 8), 1562, 132]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||