Information on Result #554764
There is no linear OOA(2245, 261, F2, 2, 122) (dual of [(261, 2), 277, 123]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2243, 261, F2, 120) (dual of [261, 18, 121]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(2123, 140, S2, 60), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 3 888746 889172 484760 459445 013730 247120 519168 / 329189 > 2123 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2245, 261, F2, 3, 122) (dual of [(261, 3), 538, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2245, 261, F2, 4, 122) (dual of [(261, 4), 799, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2245, 261, F2, 5, 122) (dual of [(261, 5), 1060, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2245, 261, F2, 6, 122) (dual of [(261, 6), 1321, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2245, 261, F2, 7, 122) (dual of [(261, 7), 1582, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2245, 261, F2, 8, 122) (dual of [(261, 8), 1843, 123]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||