Information on Result #554821

There is no linear OOA(2247, 264, F2, 2, 123) (dual of [(264, 2), 281, 124]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2246, 264, F2, 122) (dual of [264, 18, 123]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2247, 264, F2, 3, 123) (dual of [(264, 3), 545, 124]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2247, 264, F2, 4, 123) (dual of [(264, 4), 809, 124]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2247, 264, F2, 5, 123) (dual of [(264, 5), 1073, 124]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2247, 264, F2, 6, 123) (dual of [(264, 6), 1337, 124]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2247, 264, F2, 7, 123) (dual of [(264, 7), 1601, 124]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2247, 264, F2, 8, 123) (dual of [(264, 8), 1865, 124]-NRT-code) [i]