Information on Result #554878

There is no linear OOA(2249, 384, F2, 2, 113) (dual of [(384, 2), 519, 114]-NRT-code), because 1 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(2248, 384, F2, 112) (dual of [384, 136, 113]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2249, 384, F2, 3, 113) (dual of [(384, 3), 903, 114]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(2249, 384, F2, 4, 113) (dual of [(384, 4), 1287, 114]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2249, 384, F2, 5, 113) (dual of [(384, 5), 1671, 114]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2249, 384, F2, 6, 113) (dual of [(384, 6), 2055, 114]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2249, 384, F2, 7, 113) (dual of [(384, 7), 2439, 114]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2249, 384, F2, 8, 113) (dual of [(384, 8), 2823, 114]-NRT-code) [i]