Information on Result #555282
There is no linear OOA(311, 16, F3, 2, 8) (dual of [(16, 2), 21, 9]-NRT-code), because 2 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(39, 16, F3, 6) (dual of [16, 7, 7]-code), but
- “vE2†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(311, 16, F3, 3, 8) (dual of [(16, 3), 37, 9]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(311, 16, F3, 4, 8) (dual of [(16, 4), 53, 9]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(311, 16, F3, 5, 8) (dual of [(16, 5), 69, 9]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||